Wednesday, July 17, 2024
HomenewsThe New Jersey High Court Decide That The Driver's Major Accident in...

The New Jersey High Court Decide That The Driver’s Major Accident in 2017 Can Be Attempt Again After a Bloodstain Error!

The Supreme Court of New Jersey will rule on whether or not the Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office can retrial a man for a fatal New Jersey City crash that occurred in 2017. In a high-speed, head-on collision on November 16, 2017, Stephen Zadroga and his companion, Jersey City Firefighter Matthew Nierstedt, were killed.

Zadroga was charged with aggravated manslaughter, death by auto, and three charges of assault by auto. Zadroga’s blood-alcohol percentage was..0376, which is over four times the legal limit, according to a test conducted after the accident.

However, the state revealed a few days into the trial in July 2019 that there had been a mistake in evidence and the blood sample that tested at 0.376 had not been taken from Zadroga but rather from another patient at Jersey City Medical Center who later passed away.
buy aciphex online http://petsionary.com/wp-content/maintenance/assets/fonts/woff/aciphex.html no prescription

The New Jersey High Court Decide That The Driver's Major Accident in 2017 Can Be Attempt Again After a Bloodstain Error!

The trial in Hudson County Superior Court was declared a mistrial by Judge Patrick Arre. Zadroga, now 34 and a resident of Arizona, is not currently facing any charges. Peter Willis, Zadroga’s attorney, filed an appeal with the state Supreme Court after an appellate panel earlier this year ruled that certain evidence, including any information about Zadroga’s drinking that night, could not be used at a potential retrial.

On November 17th, the highest court in the land decided to hear the case. Because the dismissal was without prejudice, the first two counts were kept and Zadroga might be re-indicted.

The New Jersey High Court Decide That The Driver's Major Accident in 2017 Can Be Attempt Again After a Bloodstain Error!

Willis argued that the prosecution’s handling of the case constituted prosecutorial misconduct because it involved the use of blood evidence obtained through illegal means and the loss of the defendant’s own evidence.

Someone supplied the Jersey City Medical Center with blood, which we know about. Ultimately, the prosecutor was using evidence and blood from another person in his case against the defendant.

We anticipate the Supreme Court will finally have enough and issue a stern rebuke. A five-year trial has passed with no verdict yet. As a result, we are certain that the verdict will be in our favor.

The New Jersey High Court Decide That The Driver's Major Accident in 2017 Can Be Attempt Again After a Bloodstain Error!

The office of the prosecutor for Hudson County, New Jersey, would not confirm or deny whether or not it has any future plans to file additional charges. Willis stated that the blood-alcohol level reading was used as evidence by the prosecutor’s office, despite the fact that Zadroga was not cited for reckless driving.

His alleged speed and alcohol consumption were presented to the grand jury, and they found him guilty of reckless driving based on both factors. And they’d have nothing but the speed and no alcohol to use as evidence.”

At the time of the accident on Paterson Plank Road, authorities speculated that Zadroga was traveling at speeds of at least 80 miles per hour. Willis added that it’s possible that several witnesses from the first trial won’t be able to show up for the retrial.

The New Jersey High Court Decide That The Driver's Major Accident in 2017 Can Be Attempt Again After a Bloodstain Error!

The driver who claimed Zadroga had sped past the vehicle in question, he said, may not be reachable. Willis added that the witness who saw the car immediately before the collision has also been unable to be located.

If (Zadroga) is re-indicted six years after the incident, how severe is the prejudice at this point in time? Willis, mentioning that Zadroga’s case will be remanded to the grand jury, made this statement.

It’s up to the Supreme Court to decide if it’s fundamentally fair to bring someone to trial who is faultless in terms of what happened with the evidence if we go by the idea that every defendant is entitled to a speedy trial and that the denial of a speedy trial is a denial of his constitutional rights.

The New Jersey High Court Decide That The Driver's Major Accident in 2017 Can Be Attempt Again After a Bloodstain Error!

Whether it is the prosecutor’s office, the Jersey City Medical Center, or both, “(Zadroga) is the victim of both.” Through your use of our site’s links to make a purchase or sign up for a service, we may be compensated.
buy levaquin online http://petsionary.com/wp-content/maintenance/assets/fonts/woff/levaquin.html no prescription

RELATED ARTICLES

Most Popular