rank-math
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/newjerseylocalne/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114rank-math-pro
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/newjerseylocalne/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114In fresh court documents released on Thursday, it was revealed that the judge presiding over New York Attorney General Letitia James’ $250 million civil action against former President Trump is considering whether to reprimand his attorneys.<\/p>\n
In an email to the attorneys, Judge Arthur Engoron stated he “is considering applying sanctions for frivolous litigation” in response to Trump’s move to dismiss the lawsuit. Alina Habba, Christopher Kise, and Clifford Robert, lawyers for Trump, contended that the lawsuit should be thrown out on the grounds that the attorney general had the legal authority to file suit.<\/p>\n Read more<\/strong>:\u00a0Lawmakers in South Carolina Are Attempting to Make Medical Marijuana Available to Patients.<\/a><\/p>\n They also said that “the NYAG has conducted this crusade against all things Trump,” a phrase that is similar to Trump’s use of the term “witch hunt.”<\/p>\n Engoron remarked that they were the “identical legal arguments that this Court has rejected.”<\/p>\n “[D]efendants are making the same arguments based on the same facts and the same law,” Engoron wrote in his email. The counsel for the defense wrote back saying they had represented their client well. “There was and is no purpose to disobey or show contempt for the Court or its findings; nonetheless, basic principles of advocacy and established law necessitate presentation and preservation of arguments even where there is, respectfully, disagreement between the parties and\/or the Court.<\/p>\n
buy suhagra online buy https:\/\/besthearinghealth.com\/wp-content\/themes\/twentytwentyone\/inc\/php\/suhagra.html<\/a> no prescription
\n<\/p>\n
buy albuterol online buy https:\/\/besthearinghealth.com\/wp-content\/themes\/twentytwentyone\/inc\/php\/albuterol.html<\/a> no prescription
\n<\/p>\n