rank-math
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/newjerseylocalne/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114rank-math-pro
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/newjerseylocalne/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114After a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling effectively invalidated significant elements of New Jersey’s restricted permission system for the concealed carry of firearms, state legislators are attempting to adopt a new version of the legislation by the end of the year.<\/p>\n
The legislation (A4769), which is sponsored by Gov. Phil Murphy and his fellow Democrats who presently control both houses of the Legislature, has been met with staunch resistance from Republican politicians and gun rights supporters during a series of protracted and frequently boisterous public hearings.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The legislation was approved by the state Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee on Monday by a vote of 8 to 4.<\/p>\n
For decades, New Jersey’s concealed carry regulations were among the strictest in the country, to the point where only former law enforcement officers could demonstrate a “justifiable need” to obtain a permit.<\/p>\n
However, the Supreme Court ruled in June to virtually invalidate New York’s concealed carry regulations \u2014 a judgment generally referred to as the Bruen case \u2014 rendering New Jersey’s concealed carry statute susceptible to legal challenges.<\/p>\n
Democratic leaders in New Jersey replied with a bill to revamp concealed carry in the state, arguing that precautions are necessary if more people carry concealed firearms.<\/p>\n
Their idea is supported by a variety of proponents of gun control and law enforcement groups.<\/p>\n
Legislative leaders missed a self-imposed November deadline to pass the law, but Monday’s vote forwarded it to the full state Senate, which will meet again on December 22. If passed at that time, the bill would travel to the governor’s desk.<\/p>\n
Murphy has indicated a willingness to sign it.<\/p>\n
From then, the measure’s legal destiny is uncertain. A federal judge determined in November that crucial sections of New York’s post-Supreme Court ruling cleanup plan are unconstitutional, leaving the bill in limbo.<\/p>\n
Both opponents and proponents of the New Jersey measure anticipate litigation as soon as the ink is dry.<\/p>\n