Sunday, October 2, 2022
Home news The Pentagon Has No Answers for Female Service Members Since Roe v....

The Pentagon Has No Answers for Female Service Members Since Roe v. Wade Was Overturned!

As a result of today’s historic decision by the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade, some service members who were planning to relocate to red states are scrambling to find new jobs. Officials tell NatSec Daily that the Pentagon does not yet have a strategy in place to accommodate female military members stationed in places where abortion is illegal.

The Hyde Amendment forbids troops from using their Tricare health insurance to cover the cost of abortions at private clinics unless the mother’s life is in danger. Female troops seeking the operation already face significant obstacles to receiving the care they require.

The Military Is Unable.

The Pentagon has no answers for female service members since Roe v. Wade was overturned.

In addition, women in the military are unable to go to a different state for treatment since they are unable to leave their posts quickly or quietly. According to Southwestern Law School professor Rachel Vanlandingham, “the largest problem presently is the lack of complete flexibility to travel when you want to travel without having to acquire permission from a supervisor.” She was an Air Force judge advocate.

Because of their involuntary assignment, women serving in the military in the United States will now be subject to the whims of the states in which they are stationed. There are regulations in place to assist personnel who feel “unsafe or discriminated against” by the military, according to’s KONSTANTIN TOROPIN and Thomas Novelly. However, each provider is free to set its own policies. POLITICO has learned that Defense Secretary LLOYD AUSTIN‘s administration is taking the lead in developing any new policy for female servicemembers stationed in states that have outlawed abortion.

Covid’s Service-By-Service Policies.

Covid’s service-by-service policies were confused and in constant upheaval during the past two years, according to one of the officials involved. “Nothing is more important to me or to this Department than the health and well-being of our Service members, civilian employees, and DOD families,” Austin said in a statement released in the late afternoon. I am dedicated to safeguarding the well-being of our personnel as well as the resiliency and readiness of our Armed Forces.

To ensure that we continue to provide seamless access to reproductive health care as permitted by federal law, the Department of Health and Human Services is reviewing this decision. As a result, while Democratic lawmakers are attempting to strengthen protections for these troops, their efforts are being met with harsh opposition by their Republican counterparts.

House Appropriations Committee Democrats.

House Appropriations Committee Democrats just passed legislation that basically prohibits military commanders from withholding leave from troops who are either seeking or assisting in the process of obtaining an abortion, our own LAWRENCE UKENYE reports. Proposals to remove the original measure from Pentagon’s annual budget bill were also defeated.

A House Appropriations Chair remarked, “Now is the moment to empower all women to make very personal life decisions without politicians forcing themselves into the doctor’s office” (D-Conn). Rep. ANDY HARRIS (R-Md.) offered an amendment to remove the military clause that would have protected troops’ access to abortions, arguing that the inclusion of the protection was a political decision by the Democrats to include it. Military personnel seeking cancer screening and mental health treatment should have the same leave protections, he asked.

The Country’s Domestic Intelligence.

“This committee should not be interfering in the military,” Harris added. We can’t afford to play politics with a bill this essential. In an interview with our own CHRISTOPHER MILLER, four individuals who are close to President ZELENSKYY and a Western diplomat who has counseled Kyiv on reforms say that ZELENSKYY plans to replace the man he picked to oversee the country’s domestic intelligence and security agency. IVAN BAKANOV—childhood Zelenskyy’s pal who led his entertainment company, then his presidential campaign, and was later chosen to oversee the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU)—is on the outs after a number of embarrassing blunders following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

According to some of these insiders, Zelenskyy has lost faith in Bakanov and the two men no longer speak except on official matters. With the fight still raging, a seamless transition may be difficult. One source told Miller that Zelenskyy is concerned about the optics of removing someone from his inner circle. SBU’s day-to-day activities are currently being handled by Zelenskyy and his chief of staff, ANDRIY YERMAK, who are still in Zelenskyy’s good books.

Ukraine’s Borders.

The Pentagon has no answers for female service members since Roe v. Wade was overturned.

“We are working to get rid of him,” a high-ranking Ukrainian official close to Zelenskyy said under condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive personnel issues. “We are not satisfied with his managerial, you know, [abilities] because today you need … anti-crisis management skills that we don’t think that he has.” Bakenov, who’s been with Zelenskyy throughout the latter’s rise from a skinny comedian in Kryvyi Rih to a robust, war-hardened leader known far beyond Ukraine’s borders, is a 47-year-old lanky man with a wiry frame.

His appointment as head of the SBU in 2019 was challenged by opposition parties who claimed that someone with his history wasn’t qualified to oversee Russia’s top intelligence agency. Opponents, on the other hand, were powerless to stop the president’s most trusted confidant and business partner. As Bakanov’s critics resonate in government and parliament, some feel vindicated. Kyiv residents believe he failed to effectively command his massive department of over 30,000 agents when Russia invaded on February 24.

Several Top Agency Officials.

Several top agency officials, as well as a Western ambassador, expressed concern that Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, which began in the early hours and days, may have cost the country valuable land, including the important city of Kherson. Kherson was the first major Ukrainian city to be seized by Russian soldiers since the beginning of the full-scale invasion. A week after Vladimir Putin’s fresh operation began, Russia’s military seized the town of Kaliningrad.

Because of a failure by SBU authorities in Kherson to blow up the Antonovskiy Bridge, Russian troops were able to sail into Kherson, according to Ukrainian officials who spoke on condition of anonymity. U.S. Military Control in Asia Possible: What we learned from Alex Ward’s final week in Seoul was that the U.S. will “probably” dispatch more military forces to East Asia in the case of North Korea conducting a seventh nuclear test, according to South Korean authorities.

South Korean Official.

The Pentagon has no answers for female service members since Roe v. Wade was overturned.

According to a South Korean official, such an increased presence is more than 50% likely. Despite the official’s omission of specifics, there was some mention of the United States coming closer to the Korean peninsula in the days immediately following the test. There is a plan in place to respond strongly to an explosion by North Korea, but the exact timing and character of the retaliation remain a mystery to Ward.

Despite the uncertainty, South Korean officials are confident that a test will take place within the next few weeks or months, and that it will necessitate a strong, but not deadly, punishment. A Cold Shift in A Foggy Bottom Is a First for Natsec Daily! Our own NAHAL TOOSI has learned that the State Department-based U.S. coordinator for the Arctic region, JIM DEHART, has stepped down. DEREK CHOLLET, the department’s counselor, will handle his responsibilities for the time being.

Geopolitical Competition.

The Pentagon has no answers for female service members since Roe v. Wade was overturned.

Climate change, global energy demand, and geopolitical competition between the United States, Russia, and China have all contributed to the Arctic’s rise in importance. It’s a subject on which the United States and Russia have previously sought common ground. The coordinator job is being considered for promotion to ambassadorial status in Congress. Foreign Service veteran DeHart is moving to the National Defense University as an instructor. NatSec Daily asked Chollet a few questions regarding his Arctic aspirations, and he responded as follows: Asked, “What’s the most important thing for you to do?”

It’s clear to us that we have a strategic opportunity at this time. This administration has made it a top priority to improve our performance in the Arctic in light of the numerous difficulties and opportunities that exist there. On his own, ANTONY BLINKEN devoted considerable attention and effort to the issue. When the Arctic Council met in Iceland last year, he was there. As a result, we’ll keep working on this diplomatically and energetically… It’s also a technique to make sure something stays in front of the secretary’s mind because it’s essential to him, too.”

The United States and Russia Have Been Working Together.

According to the hypothesis, the United States and Russia have been working together, while China is watching. Given the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, how feasible is it to believe that such collaboration can continue? We are definitely dedicated to peaceful collaboration in the Arctic, particularly through the Arctic Council.” As of now, we’re working on issues that don’t involve Russian involvement in the council. Because of this, we can only resume working on council projects that have already been approved or are currently in progress but do not involve Russians. … As part of our “no more business as usual” campaign, we believe this is a viable option.

As a founding member of the Arctic Council, Russia has a difficult time being kicked out. But after the invasion of Ukraine, a core group of countries with similar views… suspended their participation in the Arctic Council universally. As a result, we’re getting back to work on previously approved projects that don’t require Russian assistance. Obviously, we’d like to work with all eight Arctic states in the council at some point in the future. That said, given what Russia has done and is doing, it’s not the right moment to take this step.” Is there anything that the public should know about the Arctic that they don’t already?

Related Articles:

Indigenous Populations.

The Pentagon has no answers for female service members since Roe v. Wade was overturned.

There is a major change taking place in the Arctic. Although it’s been recognized for a long time for collaboration in the region, it’s becoming more difficult as Russia and China’s operations and attempts to secure a foothold in the region have increased tensions. Furthermore, it is clear that the Arctic is warming rapidly.

Three times as rapidly as the global average, it’s heating up, and that’s going to have major implications. Economic issues will arise as a result of that. Of sure, there will be opportunities. As a result, indigenous populations will be affected, as well as mounting security issues, in this crucial region. As a result, “what’s occurring in the Arctic matters quite a bit” when considering our strategic interests.

Marissa Figgs
I write picture books, for middle grade, and young adults, some of which have won prizes, been filmed, or become bestsellers. I've ghostwritten for Pixar and developed teen work for Alloy Entertainment. I think heartfelt writing is the finest. It doesn't have to be personal, but it must be visceral. You want them riveted from the first word, page, or sentence, no matter how painful or unpleasant, and that's my expertise.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular